On Being As A Child I Was, The Unintended Sequel :)

ASSALAMU`ALAIKUM WARAHMATULLAH

OMMA, never thought that this topic has its sequel after the previous entry I wrote about naiveness. Well, ideas came and so here I am- dumbfounded- and am doing my obligation as a blogger. Things that you write which has no clarity in the end should be pointed again. My principle of blogging is to keep on saying something about something, until there's no more to be talked about. Hehehehe (excuse to cover up the obsession :P).

Law of Relationship sucks for children

All grown-ups in the world know, that love should be put higher in terms of priority and standard in their relationship, whatever it is. There's absolutely no exception to this for all of those who understand. If you really want to build a strong relationship, you need to overcome the capitalism that is embedded deep within you with love. Power of love, yo... they can take you farther than any plane can, and can give you more than any billionaire could ever offer.

With love, you'll have the capacity to achieve anything. You don't have to worry about the momentum of your struggles, of which you're on right now. Your beloved will always have what it needs to be an endless source of motivation. A usually underestimated fuel that can energize you to go through almost anything, even if it means sacrifice.

We'll not be talking about love and sacrifice rants in this entry, though. Going into deeper conversation, I'd like to touch about the exception of the explained rule of relationship. Lemme be your Yoda of Humanism tonight. Can I? (Forced to everyone who reads this. No escape now (welp, you DO can go away from here, right away, if you're not interested)).

In making out relationship, the importance of love as the quintessential ingredient IS seemingly sometimes, negligible. Sometimes, relationship does mean solely a way to get to the source of certain materialistic inputs (world today, huh. Unpredictable). But hey, don't tell me you prefer poor man over the rich, given they have similar spiritual qualities!? No. Hell no. Instead, you'll be having the much stabler man financially. This puts us on the line between self-explanatory contradiction and going against the remark. 

Actually, there is another relationship which can be seen as either solvable when it comes to materialistic conflict with love. Adult-children. This is not about some no-go pedobear indirect confession, it's about how adults can see materialistic stuff as the priority which is, justifiably more important in a relationship. Take this analogue as an example:

"Say, you're a father/mother who has a child. You ask them to pick between you and a bucket of M&Ms. Without hesitation, they'll go for M&Ms over you (poor you)."

Now, does this demonstration show that your relationship as being insincere? False? Again, no. This is a clear proof that material over beloved does seem justifiably valid for a strong relationship. For me personally, this is the best part of being naive. By choosing materialistic things rather than the personalities you love, you'll get more love and attention. 

People wouldn't be mad at you, moreover break their relationship with you. It'll paradoxically strengthen the relationship. Sadly, this context of relationship is only applicable for adult-children relationship. Implementing this to your girlfriend, and you'll be in hell in no time. Huff~ being a children is pretty much, enjoyable. I think.